Monday, 21 December 2020

1n2 Converges

The sum of the reciprocals of the square numbers was a particularly difficult challenge, first posed around 1650, and later named the Basel problem.

n=11n2=112+122+132+

Although there are more modern proofs, we will follow Euler’s original proof from 1734 because his methods were pretty audacious, and later influenced Riemann’s work on the prime number theorem.



Slides: [pdf]

Video: [youtube]


Taylor Series For sin(x)

We start with the familiar Taylor series for sin(x)

sin(x)=xx33!+x55!x77!


Euler’s New Series For sin(x)

The polynomial f(x)=(1xa)(1+xa) has factors (1xa) and (1+xa), and zeros at +a and a. We can shorten it to f(x)=(1x2a2).

Euler’s novel idea was to write sin(x) as a product of similar linear factors, which would lead him to a different series.

The zeros of sin(x) are at 0,±π,±2π,±3π, so the product of factors looks like the following.

sin(x)=Ax(1x2π2)(1x2(2π)2)(1x2(3π)2)

The constant A is 1 because we know sin(x)x1 as x0. Alternatively, taking the first derivative of both sides gives A=1 when x=0.

The second factor is x and not x2 because the zero of sin(x) at x=0 has multiplicity 1.

Euler then expanded out the series.

sin(x)=x[1x2π2(112+122+132+)+X]

Inside the square brackets, the terms with powers of x higher than 2 are contained in X.


Comparing The Two Series

The terms in Euler’s new series and the Taylor series must be equivalent because they both represent sin(x). Let’s pick out the x3 terms from both series.

x33!=x3π2(112+122+132+)

We can easily rearrange this to give us the desired infinite sum.

π26=112+122+132+

Euler, aged 28, had solved the long standing Basel problem, not only proving the infinite series of squared reciprocals converged, but giving it an exact value.

n=11n2=π26


Rigour

Euler’s original proof was adventurous in expressing sin(x) as an infinite product of simple linear factors. It made intuitive sense, but at the time was not rigorously justified.

It was almost 100 years later when Weierstrass developed and proved a factorisation theorem that confirmed Euler’s leap was legitimate.

No comments:

Post a Comment